For almost two years, Mark never asked how the boys were doing. Not through a text, not in a phone call — but more strikingly, not even through the very channels available to him: Our Family Wizard, the court-mandated and approved communication platform.

Meanwhile, one of his sons was receiving care for a life-threatening eating disorder. As documented by Dr. Rao at Kartini Clinic, this wasn’t mild or ambiguous — this was a case so severe that it halted Liam’s growth, delayed his development by years, and placed his life and future at riskDr. Rao. It was also well-documented that Liam had suffered setbacks and distress directly tied to interactions with Mark, which led to the very RO limiting his influence.

And still: not a single inquiry, even indirectly.

Instead, Mark focused on social media posts, conspiracy commentary, self-promotion, and cultivating the image of a parent alienated by unjust forces. But behind the performance was a simple, damning fact:

In nearly two years, he never asked anyone — attorney, GAL, mother, or the court — “How are the boys doing?”
Not even about the one fighting for his life.

To be fair, he has no legal right to direct information — that’s true and correct.
The restraining order (RO) prohibits him from contacting the boys directly or influencing their care. It also restricts access to their personal medical information unless otherwise authorized by the court or their legal guardians.

But what’s revealing is that Mark has never even demonstrated the most basic level of care or initiative to inquire in the ways still available to him — ways the law permits and encourages for any parent who claims to care.

He could have:

• Used Our Family Wizard, the court-approved and mandated communication platform — where any question would have been safely documented and visible to all parties, including attorneys, the courts, & GAL.
• Asked his attorney to formally inquire on his behalf — a route explicitly open to him even under the RO.
• Reached out to the Guardian ad Litem (GAL) — whose entire role is to represent the children’s best interests and report back to the court.
• Filed an appropriate motion in court — if he truly believed he had been kept in the dark unfairly or wished to express parental concern.

None of these actions would have violated the restraining order. In fact, they are precisely the methods that exist for parents in his position to remain involved appropriately and lawfully.

That he never once chose to use these avenues speaks volumes.
His silence — nearly two years of it — wasn’t a condition forced upon him by the legal system. It was the result of his own inaction, disinterest, or calculated neglect.

The law set boundaries to protect the boys, but it didn’t prevent Mark from demonstrating genuine care within those boundaries. He simply chose not to.

His silence speaks louder than any of his posts.

Not even once.